A Ray of Hope

The conversation at a Diwali party in San Jose turned political. There were many, like me, who were frustrated specifically with President Obama, and with Democrats in general. It prompted a friend to send me a list of the President’s accomplishments the next day. I couldn’t be more surprised! It was a long list of significant achievements. Each item was meaningful to me: a quintessential middle-class Indian American.

What surprised me more was that I wasn’t aware that so much had been achieved. I am a voracious reader of news and follower of important political and policy debates in the country. It seems to me that, in the din created by the Tea Partiers, I had gone temporarily deaf. Of course, it is also possible that my hearing was just fine but there was only noise coming out of the mainstream media. The man on the street may have been looking for alternatives to rightwing rhetoric, but I recall a debate on television where Democratic pundits were advising that creating a counter movement to Tea Party would only increase the shrillness of the debate.

It is worthwhile to remember how Ronald Reagan often used to take his case to the people. His effective message was that the Democratic congress was not allowing him to do the right thing for the nation. He took his case to people even against the then-speaker of the house, the powerful and influential Tip O’Neil. One could argue that the media of Reagan’s time was different. It wasn’t the “24-hour news-as-infotainment” assault that we are subjected to today. But a more pertinent comparison, in my opinion, would be with the media in Lyndon Johnson’s or Nixon’s times.  The point is that Reagan faced similar media intensity and scrutiny as compared to his predecessors and managed it well.

There is an even more relevant example of caustic opposition to administration, to a Democratic White House this time. President Clinton functioned under continuous bitter and personal opposition from Republicans. I cannot forget the vengeful attempts of Senator D’Amato, a New York Republican, to wrongfully attribute malfeasance in Whitewater dealings and the appointment of independent prosecutor Ken Starr to continually harass the First Family. The Republicans wasted tax payers’ money, nay my money, to pursue their vendetta. Despite the harrassment, President Clinton never appeared helpless. He talked to the people vigorously and effectively and won the second term hands down.

The Republican congress during the Clinton administration convinced me to switch from being an independent voter to a Democrat. Their current pandering to Tea Party lunacy has only vindicated my decision.

However, my recent disenchatment has been caused by the Democrats in office, not the Republicans. Looking at the efforts of this administration, I think the Democrats failed miserably in two ways—by not projecting their achievements and by not taking adequate action against the excesses of Wall Street. They have failed in sending the message that we, the people of the United States, do not want our government becoming a hostage of corporations. It offends me to watch people like Senator Ron Paul and Congressman Eric Cantor badger moderate Republicans as well as the administration to benefit one percent of Americans at the cost of rest of us. Moderate Republicans with sterling careers have had to bow down to the extremist wing of their own party, while Democratic leaders remain silent and largely invisible.

I can’t recall a single campaign by my own congresswoman from the SF Bay Area or the two senators of California to stop the prevailing political extortion going on in the country.Democrats, who were largely compliant with the previous administration’s decision to go to war, at the cost of trillions of dollars and thousands of lost lives, and who approved budget-busting tax cuts and war appropriations, seem to have developed a “conscience” after the election of one of their own to the Presidency. Despite the very deep and very real hole the American economy is in, conservative members of the President’s own party are parroting the Republican mantra of tax cuts for the wealthy and emphasis on deficit reduction and austerity instead of investments in jobs for the suffering majority. There are many adjectives to describe this behavior if you are reluctant to use invectives.

But I digress. 

Today I feel that American democracy has broken down and I don’t have any real choice. I am not going to vote Republican—that is a surefire route to become a victim of Tea Party jihad. Nor can I hope of achieving any change by voting for my local Democrats.

It comes as a great relief to me that there are some among us who haven’t lost the will to fight back. My salute to the “700 of Brooklyn Bridge” who got arrested for stepping down from the walkway while attempting to Occupy Wall Street! Most of the initial coverage in the New York Times, supposedly a bastion of “liberal media,” described how police trapped them. The Grey Lady spent hardly any ink describing the cause and the motivations of the thousands of people who have been camped out there for days. Even today, the focus of coverage is on the clashes between protesters and the police rather than the motivations of the disenfranchised and their demands.

In an echo of Gandhi’s message of non-violent non-cooperation, this group of individuals has decided to fight back by peaceful means. And now the message and the movement has spread to hundreds of cities across the nation, including San Jose, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. I hope that this is a sign that Americans are finally ready to come out of their homes to demand an end to this looting by the elites of this country. And perhaps it will motivate my representatives in Congress to take a stand—for the people or against them.Check out for yourself how many executives of failed corporations were rewarded with golden severance packages. Is this how America became the world leader? By rewarding failure? I doubt it.

The Occupy Wall Street movement is a ray of hope. To my fellow citizens in New York: Don’t forget the “300 at Thermopylae!” History is built by the mortar of the impossible.

Bravo!

Vijay Rajvaidya is an entrepreneur and a political activist.

This article is part of the category: Perspectives 
This article is untagged. Browse other tags ».

Comments

This is a great article! It amazes me how we as a country we dig a hole and then sit in that hole and complain about the efforts of the people who are doing everything to not have the hole collapse on us, but pull us out! The democrats have indeed accomplished a lot - be it addressing Osama Bin Laden, Libya, or healthcare reform. I also agree that rewarding failure is to an extreme and action should be taken to not allow for high compensation for making a mess of things. However, I do think we need to keep capitalism alive - honest capitalism. I believe majority of the top 1% would have no problem in paying higher taxes - see the long list that went to capitol hill to say that. The Republicans I believe got it all wrong. Moderate america is what we need!

Having lived in four countries and having visited over thirty, I am amazed how America attracts mostly capitalists, or how Americanization tends to convert them to capitalism.

If one criticizes capitalism immediately one is accused of communism or loving poverty. This is happening in other countries too. If one criticizes crony capitalism, built on nepotism, clannishness, corruption and sycophancy, one is accused of being a communist, a religious convert or some such nonsense.

What is it about many Americans, most of whom have an immigrant history, long or short, that makes them assume that in many things in life, including in cereal boxes and cars, one must have more than two choices...but when it comes to economic theories we must either be "capitalists or communists?

Is there not something beyond that?

Is the mind not capable of thinking outside the traditional historical class-based material Anglocentric or Eurocentric theories?

If we can imagine sending humans to the moon, or creatively come up with a phone that fits into you pocket while doing what desktop computers used to do...can we not come up with a better economic and political model for progress, justice and democracy in the 21st century?

And what exactly is moderate America if the Center has moved Right? There is Right and Ultra Right...with a lot of lightweights and deadweights.

This is a problem in many countries outside the US too.

Obama struggles with some members of his party too. When it comes to certain policies there is not much difference between Rs and Ds.

Capitalism is one thing...uber capitalism, capitalism on steroids or crony capitalism is another

Post a comment